siderea: (Default)
Siderea ([personal profile] siderea) wrote2025-08-20 04:45 am
Entry tags:

Admin: Patreon: What fresh hell #728, #729 [Patreon]

Yall. I am so tired.

Last thing first. Investigating the other thing, I discovered this. I'll just cut and paste what I submitted as a ticket to Patreon:
I took a break of a few months, and when I came back my fees spiked. What gives?

I just did a month (July 2025) that extremely similar to last January (2025): similar revenues (466.19 vs 458.50), similar patrons (160 vs 162). According to my "Insights > Earnings" page, my total fees went up from 11.4% to the astounding 14.6%. Drilling down, most of that is an eye-watering 3% increase of the payment fees (5.8% to 8.8%). There was also a minor increase of Patreon's platform fee from 5.6% to 5.8%.

That represents a FIFTY-TWO PERCENT INCREASE in processing fees, and a 28% increase in fees over all.

Care to explain? Was there some announced change in payment structure or payment processor fees I missed?
I have received no response.

But the other thing is this: Patreon has dropped my business model.

Apparently by accident.

When I went to Patreon to create the Patreon post for my latest Siderea Post at the end of July, I was confronted with a recent UI update. In and of itself it wouldn't have been a problem, but, as usual, they screwed something up.

They removed the affordance for a post to Patreon to both be public and paid. The new UI conflated access and payment, such that it was no longer possible to post something world-accessible and still charge patrons for it.

I found a kludge to get around it so I could get paid at all, and I fired off a support ticket asking if it was possible but unobvious, or just not possible, and if it was not possible, whether that was a policy or a mistake. I have received very apologetic reply back from Patreon support which seemed to suggest (but not actually affirm) it was an unintentional:
From what we've seen so far, the option to make a post publicly accessible while still charging members for it isn't possible in the new editor. Content within a paid post will only be available to those with paid access, and it won't show up for the public.

Other creators have reported this same issue, and I want to reassure you that I've already shared this feedback with our team. If anything changes or if this feature is brought back, I'll be sure to keep you in mind and let you know right away.
So it's not like the reply was, "Oh, yes, it was announced that we wouldn't be supporting that feature any more," suggesting, contrarily, they didn't realize they were removing a feature at all.

The support person I was corresponding with encouraged me to write back with any further questions or issues, so I did:
Hi, [REDACTED], thanks for getting back to me. I have both some more questions and feedback.

1) Question: Am I understanding correctly, that the new UI's failure to support having publicly accessible paid posts was an oversight, and not a policy decision to no longer support that business model? Like, there's not an announcement this was going away that I missed? As a blogger who often writes about Patreon itself, I'd like to be able to clarify the situation for my readers.

2) Question: Do you have any news to share whether Patreon intends to restore this functionality? Is fixing this being put on a development roadmap, or should those of us who relied on this functionality just start making other plans? Again: my readers want to know, too.

3) Suggestion: If Patreon intends to restore this functionality, given the way the new UI is organized, the way to add the functionality back in is under "Free Access > More options" there should also be a "charge for this post" button, which then ungrays more options for charging a subset of patrons, defaulting to "charge all patrons".

4) Feedback: The affordance that was removed, of being able to charge patrons for world-accessible content, was my whole business model. I'm not the only one, as I gather you already have discovered. In case Patreon were corporately unaware, this is the business model of creators using Patreon to fund public goods, such as journalism, activism, and open source software. My patrons aren't paying me to give them something; my patrons are paying me to give something to the world. Please pass this along to whomever it's news.

5) Feedback: This is the sort of gaffe which suggests to creators that Patreon is out of touch with its users and doesn't appreciate the full breadth of how creators use Patreon. It is the latest in a long line of incidents that suggests to creators that Patreon is not a platform for creators, Patreon is a platform for music video creators, and everybody else is a red-headed stepchild whom Patreon corporately feels should be grateful they are allowed to use the platform at all. It makes those of us who are not music video creators feel unwelcome on Patreon.

6) Feedback: Being able to charge patrons for world-accessible content is one of a small and dwindling list of features that differentiated Patreon from cheaper competitors. Just sayin'.

7) Feedback: I thought you should know: my user experience has become that when I open Patreon to make a post, I have no idea whether I will be able to. I have to schedule an hour to engage with the Patreon new post workflow because I won't know what will be changed, what will be broken, etc. It would be nice if Patreon worked reliably. My experience as a creator-user of your site is NOT, "Oh, I don't like the choices available to me", it's that the site is unstable, flaky, unpredictable, unreliable.
I got this response:
Hi Siderea,

Thank you so much for your thoughtful follow-up and for sharing your questions and feedback in such detail.

To address your first question, I can’t speak to whether this change was an oversight or a deliberate policy decision, but I can confirm there hasn’t been any official announcement about removing the ability to charge members for world-accessible posts. If anything changes or if we receive more clarity from our product team, I’ll be sure to keep you updated.

At this time, I also don’t have any news to share about whether this functionality will be restored or if it’s on the development roadmap.

I know that’s not the most satisfying answer, but I want to reassure you that your feedback and suggestions are being shared directly with the relevant teams. The more we can highlight how important this feature is for creators like you, the better.

Thank you as well for your suggestion about how this could be reintroduced in the UI—I’ll make sure to pass that along, along with your broader feedback about the impact on creators who fund public goods. Your perspective is incredibly valuable, and I just want to truly thank you for taking the time to lay it all out so clearly.

If you have any more thoughts, questions, or ideas, please let me know, and I’ll be happy to take a further look. I appreciate your patience and your willingness to advocate for the creator community.

All the best,
[REDACTED]
Several observations:

0) Whoa.

1) That is the best customer service response letter I've ever gotten, for reasons I will perhaps break down at some other junction. But it both does and does not read like it was written by an AI. I didn't quite know what to make of it, until someone mentioned to me the phenomenon of customer service agents at another org using AI to generate letters, and then I was like, oooooooh, maybe that's what this is. Or maybe not. Hard to say.

2) Though [REDACTED] could not confirm or deny, it sure sounds like an accident, but one that impacts such an uninteresting-to-Patreon set of creators that they can't be arsed to fix it, either in a timely way or at all.

3) "The more we can highlight how important this feature is for creators like you, the better." is a hell of a sentence. Especially in conjunction with "...along with your broader feedback about the impact on creators who fund public goods.". Reading between the lines, it sure sounds like the support people have been inundated by a little wave of outraged/anguished public-good posters, and the support people, or at least this support person, is entirely on the creators' side against higher ups brushing them off. Could be a pose, of course, but, dayum.
So that's what I know from Patreon's side.

The kludge I came up with for the post I made at the end of July is that I used another new feature – the ability to drop a cut line across a Patreon post where above it is world readable and below it is paid access only – to make a paid-access only post where 100% of the post contents are above the cut line.

Please let me know if it's not working as intended. This unfortunately has the gross effect of putting a button on my new post saying "Join to unlock".

So.

In any event, I strongly encourage those of you following me as unpaid subscribers over on Patreon to make sure you're following me, instead, here on Dreamwidth, because Patreon is flaky.

I will make a separate post with instructions as to all the ways to do that. You can get email notifications of my posts (either all or just the Siderea Posts), follow RSS and Atom feeds, get DM inbox notifications, and, of course, just follow me on your DW reading page, all on/through Dreamwidth, anonymously and completely free.
nanila: me (Default)
Mad Scientess ([personal profile] nanila) wrote in [community profile] awesomeers2025-08-20 08:06 am
Entry tags:

Just One Thing (20 August 2025)

It's challenge time!

Comment with Just One Thing you've accomplished in the last 24 hours or so. It doesn't have to be a hard thing, or even a thing that you think is particularly awesome. Just a thing that you did.

Feel free to share more than one thing if you're feeling particularly accomplished! Extra credit: find someone in the comments and give them props for what they achieved!

Nothing is too big, too small, too strange or too cryptic. And in case you'd rather do this in private, anonymous comments are screened. I will only unscreen if you ask me to.

Go!
elisem: (Default)
Elise Matthesen ([personal profile] elisem) wrote2025-08-20 01:10 am

on the approach to this birthday

 Life is certainly enhanced with the improvement of available captioning in real time through various browsers and software. I want to have virtual tea with so many different people! I can see what they are saying! And it doesn't leave me exhausted the way lip-reading so often does. Maybe making a whole bunch of virtual tea dates will be another set of birthday presents. Things to look forward to. Always good.

Also there needs to be some storytelling. Some virtual storytelling gatherings, I mean. Even more things to look forward to.  In the meantime, I plan to continue enjoying the next few days as we approach Friday, which is the birthday actual.

If anybody wants to do a kind thing, letting people know about my Birthday Month Sale is a very kind thing indeed, and maximizes the amount of good stuff like bill-paying and bead-acquiring that this Lioness is able to do. <3 <3 <3

LionessElise's Birthday Month Sale:
Sale goes all through the month of August. 
As usual, there will be special birthday markdowns on the 22nd.
There will be more markdowns as the month goes on.
Expect the last days to be lively. And the last hours to be very bouncy indeed.
When it's done, anything left goes back to full price.
www.etsy.com/shop/LionessElise

ndrosen ([personal profile] ndrosen) wrote2025-08-20 01:32 am
Entry tags:

An Old Acquaintance

Karl Gallagher credits Stephanie Folse of Augusta Scarlet LLC for the cover art and design of War by Other Means. I remember Ms. Folse from the Bujold list, many years ago, so I checked out https://www.scarlettebooks.com, and sent her an email. I’m not a book author myself, but if you’ve written an sf adventure novel, or a romantasy, or a cosy Sapphic romance, or something, you might want to check out the website, and consider commissioning her services.

I don’t know whether she illustrates books on political economy.
elisem: (Default)
Elise Matthesen ([personal profile] elisem) wrote2025-08-20 12:08 am

I'll have the indecision platter and a side order of WTF, please.

[Content Notes: this is a discussion of food and eating, and diabetes and new experiences, and I am a recovering eating disorder person. If that's not what you want to read about right now, please skip with my good wishes.]

Since it's that time of the year, I have been ordering a few things, telling myself that I might as well try them for this birthday rather than wait, because the possibilities of various tariffs may put them out of reach in the future.  When I say that the indecision platter is often my favorite thing on the menu, I'm talking about those meals that have samplers of several sort of dish. They are very good for learning about the range of foods sometimes. Also they can be a dopamine hit jackpot, at least for me. (If it's the dopamine that's providing the fun in here, as people who know the recent hypotheses tell me.)

They also save time if I can't make up my mind, which can be handy.

When looking at an unfamiliar menu, do you usually first make note of what you've never had before? Is it even more intriguing if you'd never heard of it before? 

The ordering has been proceeding with perhaps too much vigor, but hey. I have so few wild indulgences left on my to-do list these days, or should I say the can-do list? Probably. But I am doing my best to be sensible. I took the canned haggis off the list because I already know I love haggis. I did not take the little durian cakes off the list because although I already know I love durian, they were just a few dollars and MUST HAVE. (Note to self: ask brother-in-law to scope out CostCo's supply again. A year or two ago they had multipacks of durian mooncakes for ridiculously good prices. Om nom nom.) Some of my favorite drinks are coming (Milkis and San Pellegrino pomegranate/orange drink) because I fully expect tariffs to play hob with their prices. Even now they are a bunch higher than they were, but a person sufficiently motivated can make a melograno/arancia drink be the long-lasting slowly savored high point of their day, which is how I'll be approaching those. 

There are some garlic sable cookies coming. Garlic sable cookies! I have never! I must!  Those are an excellent example of the treasured WTF category. If it makes me immediately ask "Can you DO that??" it's a WTF delight and I want to know what it's like. Or to put it another way, my ignorance has provided endless opportunities for learning, and learning is so often so much fun -- and very tasty.

Part of the reason I'll be savoring things slowly is that I'm adapting to living with type 2 diabetes, which I've been dealing with for a year now. I got really, really lucky and got two excellent things from becoming a Metformin taker. One is an effect, and the other is, I think, a side effect. The effect is that it apparently went and repaired whatever sensor in me has to do with satiation, and tweaked the setting some, so I turn out to be done having food now,, thank you very much, earlier than I historically have been. A lot of this is because -- OK, I don't know if anybody else has this, but I used to do comfort eating, where certain things are very soothing. And that's different now. There is no soothing from food. It was pretty startling when I realized it. It's so weird when suddenly it does not work. I mean, at ALL. So that's one thing, and I think it's an effect.  The other thing is a side effect, but I do not mind it. It is this:  everything tastes wonderful. No, I mean WONDERFUL.  Plastic packet ramen might as well be gourmet. But the effect mentioned earlier holds: I don't feel like overeating. No matter how wonderful. I can go "Oh, that was so good," mean it entirely, and then go do the next thing. 

It is all so very weird. But it's kind of fun. (I appear to have also lost the ability to fret about food or weight or whatever.) We shall see where it leads.

Right now where it's leading is to ordering some birthday treats and then wondering how long they will last under the new schedule of savoring things. (The only thing I have found that I nom more than I want of is Swedish Bubs in pomegranate/strawberry flavor. Well, and those jelly snails. But those are both texture craving things, and that's a different issue.) Neurodiversity and food stuff is complicated even before getting to the land of Metformin. So far, though, it's better rather than not, even the uncomfortable bits where a coping mechanism isn't any more and needs to change. In the meantime, though, I have durian cakes and garlic sables and fruit-juice-filled gumme koi coming, and life is good that way.

Is there a new-to-you thing you have tasted that was a learning experience? Was it a delight? Was it tasty? Do you have texture cravings? Other cravings? Did you ever do comfort eating and then have it stop working for you? What then? (I find myself going to the workbench more. Which is not a bad result, really. Art is also comfort. Still comfort, I guess I should say. Do you have anything like that?)


ndrosen ([personal profile] ndrosen) wrote2025-08-20 01:28 am
Entry tags:

New Shoes

I recently ordered two pairs of canvas shoes; the price was considerably higher than what think I paid last time. I suspect that I’m seeing the results of the tariffs which Dishonest Donald has unlawfully imposed.
skygiants: Lord Yon from Legend of the First King's Four Gods in full regalia; text, 'judging' (judging)
skygiants ([personal profile] skygiants) wrote2025-08-19 09:22 pm

(no subject)

The last of the four Hugo Best Novel nominees I read (I did not get around to Service Model or Someone You Can Build A Nest In) was A Sorceress Comes to Call, which ... I think perhaps I have hit the point, officially, at which I've read Too Much Kingfisher; which is not, in the grand scheme of things, that much. But it's enough to identify and be slightly annoyed by repeated patterns, by the type of people who, in a Kingfisher book, are Always Good and Virtuous, and by the type of people who are Not.

A Sorceress Comes to Call is a sort of Regency riff; it's also a bit of a Goose Girl riff, although I have truly no idea what it's trying to say about the original story of the Goose Girl, a fairy tale about which one might have really a lot of things to say. Anyway, the plot involves an evil sorceress with an evil horse (named Falada after the Goose Girl horse) who brings her abused teen daughter along with her in an attempt to seduce a kindly but clueless aristocrat into marriage. The particular method by which the evil sorceress abuses her daughter is striking and terrible, and drawn with skill. Fortunately, the abused teen daughter then bonds with the aristocrat's practical middle-aged spinster sister and her practical middle-aged friends, and learns from them how to be a Practical Heroine in her own right, and they all team up to defeat the evil sorceress mother and her evil horse. The good end happily, and the bad unhappily. At no point is anybody required to feel sympathy for the abusive sorceress mother or the evil horse. If this is the sort of book you like you will probably like this book, and you can stop reading here.

ungenerous readings below )
THE CITY – NYC News ([syndicated profile] thecityny_feed) wrote2025-08-19 09:38 pm

Tisch Declines to Punish Cop Who Fatally Shot Fleeing Driver

Posted by Yoav Gonen

NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch speaks at the Walt Whitman Houses in Fort Greene, Brooklyn about quality of life policing.

Despite a plea by the city’s Civilian Complaint Review Board that she reconsider, NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch on Friday made final a ruling that Lt. Jonathan Rivera should not face discipline for the October 2019 shooting death of a 31-year-old driver following a car stop in The Bronx, according to documents obtained by THE CITY. 

It’s the first high-profile disciplinary decision for Tisch, who has announced several efforts to boost officer accountability since she was tapped as commissioner by Mayor Eric Adams in November. 

Tisch ruled, contrary to the recommendation of an NYPD administrative judge, that Rivera should not be terminated. 

The judge, Deputy Trial Commissioner Rosemarie Maldonado, had found that evidence presented at Rivera’s disciplinary trial established that he was not justified in shooting Allan Feliz point blank in the chest, out of his stated fear for the safety of a fellow officer. 

“Looking at the totality of what transpired during the car stop and subsequent struggle, I am convinced that [Rivera] shot Mr. Feliz because he believed that doing so was necessary to save Officer Barrett’s life,” Tisch wrote in her August 15 decision.

According to summaries of the incident by Tisch and the administrative judge, Feliz was driving a rented Volkswagen SUV in Williamsbridge on Oct. 17, 2019, when then-Sgt. Rivera and officers Edward Barrett and Michelle Almanzar pulled him over for allegedly not wearing a seatbelt.

Feliz, who was driving with an unidentified passenger, handed Barrett his brother’s drivers license, which came back with open warrants for minor violations when Barrett checked it. The red flag prompted Barrett to ask Feliz to step out of the car.

It was later revealed that Feliz was on federal parole for sale of a controlled substance, and items found on him after his death tested positive for cocaine and methamphetamine.

The summaries say Feliz got out of the vehicle, but before he could be patted down, he darted back into the car and tried to drive off — at which point Barrett grabbed him and tried to pull him out of the vehicle and fought to keep the car in park. 

As they struggled, Rivera jumped over the passenger in the front seat and tried to help Barrett disengage Feliz from the gearshift. Rivera initially shot Feliz with a Taser and then threatened to shoot him with his drawn gun, before reholstering it.

NYPD then-Sgt. Jonathan Rivera is seen on body camera footage pulling out his gun before shooting Allan Feliz in the chest after Feliz tried to flee a traffic stop, Oct. 17, 2019. Credit: Screengrab via NYPD Body Cam Footage

At one point, the vehicle surged forward a few feet with Barrett standing at the open driver’s side door, with Rivera still slumped over the passenger and engaging Feliz. Seconds later, the vehicle surged backward — sending Barrett away from the vehicle as the driver’s door slammed shut. 

Two seconds later, according to the summaries, just as Barrett returned to the driver’s side window, Rivera shot Feliz in the chest.

Rivera said he shot Feliz because after he lost sight of Barrett when the car veered backward, he worried that Barrett might be under the vehicle, and that any further movement of the car could injure or kill him.

Family members said nothing justified Barrett’s shooting.

“Me and my family are outraged and also devastated as well,” Samy Feliz, Allan’s 35-year-old brother, told THE CITY. “[Tisch] has claimed and spoken to all New Yorkers stating that she was going to be reforming and cleaning the NYPD. But her intentions are super clear, her intentions are to continue protecting killer cops.”

James Moschella, an attorney for Rivera, called Tisch’s decision “unassailable.”

“It is the only reasonable decision possible under the tragic circumstances of this incident,” said Moschella, of the firm Karasyk & Moschella, LLP. “It recognizes the undeniable fact that it was the decedent who drove this encounter, both literally and figuratively, to its tragic conclusion.” 

The family of Allan Feliz holds a press conference outside City Hall to demand justice after NYPD officer Jonathan Rivera fatally shot Feliz.
The family of Allan Feliz holds a press conference outside City Hall to demand justice after NYPD officer Jonathan Rivera fatally shot Feliz , Oct. 19, 2020. Credit: Steve Sanchez Photos/Shutterstock

An NYPD spokesperson responded to a request for comment by referring to Tisch’s decision letter.

Tisch’s ruling affirms a preliminary decision she made July 3rd, which relied in part on a report released in September 2020 by the office of State Attorney General Letitia James, which is tasked with investigating civilian deaths by law enforcement officers.

That report, which summarized the investigation of whether Rivera committed a crime, found that Rivera’s explanation that he feared for Barrett’s safety after the vehicle lurched backwards and Barrett disappeared from sight could not be disproven beyond a reasonable doubt in court. 

Tisch’s ruling also detailed multiple instances where she differed from assessments by Maldonado, the judge in the case, that Rivera’s trial testimony and explanations lacked credibility. 

In one instance, Maldonado said Rivera suggested he couldn’t see Barrett right before firing his gun because Barrett was obscured by the narrow divide at the back of the driver’s window, which she found hard to believe based on Barrett’s size. 

Tisch didn’t read Rivera’s testimony that way, and attributed the confusion over what he meant to “the sometimes messiness of testimony at trial.”

The case was brought by the Civilian Complaint Review Board, a city agency that investigates certain police misconduct — most notably use of force — and prosecutes the most serious cases in disciplinary hearings before NYPD judges like Maldonado. Final disciplinary decisions are made by the police commissioner.

The executive director and lead prosecutor of the board submitted a letter on July 11 in response to Tisch’s preliminary decision arguing that Maldonado was best suited to judge Rivera’s credibility, and that courts have ruled that deference should be given to judges to make such determinations.

“In her decision Deputy Trial Commissioner Maldonado, having had the benefit of witnessing Lieutenant Rivera’s live testimony, found that, ‘[Rivera’s] carefully constructed departure from the truth could not be reconciled with the totality of circumstances and fell apart under the weight of credible evidence,’” the CCRB officials wrote.

They also quoted Maldonado as writing in her decision that “‘critical portions of [Rivera’s] account were self-serving [statements] fabricated to minimize his culpability.’”

Since the CCRB was granted the power in 2012 to prosecute cases where its board substantiates significant misconduct by cops, only one NYPD officer has been terminated by the police commissioner: Daniel Pantaleo, five years after the chokehold death of Eric Garner on Staten Island in 2014. 

CCRB interim Chair Dr. Mohammad Khalid said the board “stands by our investigation and the conclusion of the administrative trial.”

One of Tisch’s predecessors as NYPD commissioner under Adams, Keechant Sewell, similarly overruled an administrative judge’s recommendation that an officer be terminated. 

In 2022, Sewell ruled that an officer who called an injured suspect the N-word should face significant discipline but that he could keep his job.

‘It Hurts’

The CCRB prosecutors faced a higher bar than usual to prove misconduct against Rivera because their agency missed the statute of limitations to file disciplinary charges against him. 

This was largely because the NYPD’s Force Investigation Division, which investigated first and cleared Rivera of wrongdoing, didn’t provide the board with key evidence until a week after the statute of limitations expired. 

The missed deadline meant prosecutors had to prove by a preponderance of the evidence that in shooting Feliz, Rivera had committed assault, rather than simply proving he violated NYPD procedures. They also charged Rivera with menacing for threatening to shoot Feliz earlier in their encounter, but Maldonado found Rivera not guilty of the charge.

Maldonado sought to determine whether Rivera was justified in shooting Feliz based both on whether Rivera truly feared that Barrett’s safety was in imminent harm and also whether that belief was reasonable. 

On both accounts, she found that Rivera’s justification fell short — largely because of issues with his credibility. 

Among the issues that troubled her was that Rivera didn’t ask about Barrett’s well-being in the immediate aftermath of the shooting, and he didn’t mention his concerns about Barrett’s safety when Almanazar talked with him about his being stuck in the car during the struggle.

“The engine was on, man. I was fighting. My hand was getting tired,” Rivera responded, according to Maldonado’s ruling.

Maldonado found that the statement “raises serious doubts” about Rivera’s assertions about fearing for Barrett’s safety. 

“The logical inference is that his excited utterance constituted an admission that [Rivera] discharged his firearm because he was not able to control the subject and sought to terminate the encounter because, in his own words, he was ‘tired,’” she wrote.

Tisch disagreed on both points. She said Rivera didn’t inquire about Barrett’s status after the shooting because Barrett had reappeared at the driver’s window just as Rivera fired his gun, so that Rivera knew he was OK. 

She didn’t view Rivera’s statement as an admission of any sort, but an acknowledgement that he was tired by the 90-second struggle with Feliz, and worried that Feliz could overpower him and put the car into drive while he believed that Barrett could be underneath it.

Maldonado and Tisch also viewed Rivera’s threat to shoot Feliz earlier in the struggle from different vantage points.

Maldonado saw it as a “mindset to use lethal force,” while Tisch saw it as an example of restraint: She wrote that Rivera tried deploying his Taser, strikes to the face, and threatening Feliz with a gun that he subsequently reholstered, and only when he lost sight of his colleague did he fire his weapon.

Maldonado also disputed that Rivera was reasonable in concluding that Barrett was in imminent danger at the time of the shooting, based on a number of factors — including nothing to corroborate his theory that Barrett might have fallen to the ground. 

“For deadly force to be justified under the Penal Law, it is critical that officers act upon more than a mere possibility, particularly when there is no visual confirmation of the imagined danger,” she wrote. 

And while Maldonado found Rivera “flippant and dismissive,” in part because he said he didn’t have time to yell out and wait for a response from his colleagues, Tisch found that justification credible. 

“[Rivera] and Mr. Feliz were engaged in an intense physical struggle. [Rivera] was not in a position to call a time-out and scour the driver side of the car to figure out where Officer Barrett was positioned,” she wrote. “I see that as a fair and realistic assessment of an incredibly fast-moving, dangerous situation.”

Samy Feliz said the family plans to gather on Wednesday for a rally at NYPD headquarters in Lower Manhattan. 

He said they also plan to challenge her ruling in court, and will continue to advocate for legislation to strip police commissioners of final say in disciplinary matters.

Samy Feliz added Wednesday that his brother’s son, who was 6 months old at the time of his father’s death, is now 6 years old.

“It hurts to see that child every day ask for his father,” he told THE CITY.

Our nonprofit newsroom relies on donations from readers to sustain our local reporting and keep it free for all New Yorkers. Donate to THE CITY today.

The post Tisch Declines to Punish Cop Who Fatally Shot Fleeing Driver appeared first on THE CITY - NYC News.

THE CITY – NYC News ([syndicated profile] thecityny_feed) wrote2025-08-19 07:40 pm

6-Year-Old NYC Elementary School Student and Her Mom Deported

Posted by Gwynne Hogan

A 6-year-old girl and her mother — whose arrests by ICE last week sparked widespread condemnation — were deported to Ecuador Tuesday, local elected officials said. 

Martha and her 6-year-old daughter were flown to Ecuador early Tuesday morning, according to Assemblymember Catalina Cruz, who confirmed the deportation with congressional liaisons in Rep. Alexandra Ocasio-Cortez’s office. Cruz and Councilmember Shekar Krishnan issued a joint statement saying they were heartbroken by the development. Ocasio-Cortez’s office didn’t respond to a request for comment immediately.

ICE’s detainee locator, which had previously shown Martha at one of the nation’s few family detention centers, in Texas, said that she was in Washington, D.C., late Monday evening, according to advocates. By Tuesday morning, the system no longer had any record of her whereabouts. 

A spokesperson for the Department of Homeland Security didn’t immediately return a request for comment. The agency had previously confirmed the family’s arrest and detention, saying they had removal orders in place. 

“We encourage every person here illegally to take advantage of this offer and reserve the chance to come back to the U.S. the right legal way to live American dream [sic],” Assistant Secretary Tricia McLaughlin wrote in a prior statement. “If not, you will be arrested and deported without a chance to return.”

The child had attended P.S. 89 in Queens. Its principal had pleaded with ICE agents to release her in a letter reported on by THE CITY. The student, the principal wrote, is “a kind, respectful, and dedicated young lady” whose “unexpected removal will cause significant disruption to her learning and will likely have a deep emotional impact on her classmates and our entire school community.” The girl’s name is also being withheld at the family’s request.

The 6-year-old’s arrest with her mother and 19-year-old siblingg, first reported by THE CITY, drew widespread uproar, with New York Gov. Kathy Hochul condemning it as “cruel and unjust” to break up a family this way as two other siblings remain here. Martha’s 16-year-old public high school student is now in the care of her 21-year-old brother.

“President Trump promised only to target ‘the worst of the worst,’’’ Hochul wrote in a statement Monday. “If a seven-year-old is who President Trump considers the ‘worst of the worst,’ then the promise was a lie from the start.”

But the child was hardly the first elementary school student in New York City to be arrested and then deported as part of President Donald Trump’s  mass deportation agenda. 

In June and July, the New York City field office, which covers parts of Long Island and several counties north of the city, arrested 48 children, of whom 32 had already been deported, according to ICE data shared by the Deportation Data Project

‘We Have Allowed for This To Happen’

As THE CITY previously reported, Martha arrived from Ecuador with her daughter who was five at the time and her son Manuel, who is now 19, in 2022. She had her asylum claims denied last year. 

Martha’s two other children are a 16-year-old daughter, who arrived from Ecuador last year, and a 21-year-old son, who lives in Long Island and is now caring for his sister in Queens. Because those two arrived separately, they are in different deportation proceedings.

“I’m so angry that we have allowed for this to happen. The whole world was watching,” said Mariposa Benitez, one of two volunteer social workers behind the group Mitlalli, which has created an ad-hoc, volunteer detention support network that collects the information of families who attend immigration court appointments and ICE check-ins to monitor whether they’re detained. 

Make the Road New York is now representing Manuel, who was separated from his mother and younger sister upon their arrest, the organization confirmed. Avedissian said Paige Austin, an attorney with Make the Road had worked to file emergency motions on Martha’s behalf to an immigration judge who had yet to weigh in.

“Everyone made statements and for what?” Benitez said, adding that it was even more urgent to support Martha’s 19-year-old brother Manuel who is still in ICE detention at Delaney Hall in Newark as of Tuesday afternoon, according to ICE’s detainee locator. 

“We cannot let Manuel down,” Benitez said.

Our nonprofit newsroom relies on donations from readers to sustain our local reporting and keep it free for all New Yorkers. Donate to THE CITY today.

The post 6-Year-Old NYC Elementary School Student and Her Mom Deported appeared first on THE CITY - NYC News.

Jackson Heights Post ([syndicated profile] jacksonheights_post_feed) wrote2025-08-19 09:30 pm

Can Queens’ food scene thrive with both trucks and restaurants?

Posted by schnepsrestagent

Aug. 19, 2025 By Jessica Militello

In Jackson Heights at 4 p.m. on a Thursday afternoon, Roosevelt Avenue is buzzing with energy as commuters file in and out of subway cars and onto the street and cars and trucks grapple to get down the busy road. The street is filled with rows of shops and restaurants, along with food carts, street vendors and food trucks along the avenue. The almost-but-not-quite the weekend lag leaves hungry commuters faced with another choice to make throughout their day and the array of food truck options in busy areas like Jackson Heights offers customers convenience and delicious food without breaking the bank, two features that can feel vital, particularly with rising costs of living and pressure from inflation.

The feeling is something both consumers and business owners have been feeling in their wallets, particularly small business owners who are still feeling the financial aftershocks from the pandemic. With consumers feeling the squeeze in their wallets and decision burnout, food trucks offer a delicious and quick option; however, as customers ponder what’s best for their budget, the seemingly innocuous choice has the potential to create a larger effect in the community over time. 

“I like going to this truck, I honestly never considered it to be like picking one over the other [when it comes to restaurants],” said Brandon M., who lives in the area. “It’s really good food, it’s authentic, family-run; to me it’s not about the price, but it’s definitely a bonus.”

‘Everybody has to make a living’

With so much at stake, some business owners throughout the borough feel that the presence of food trucks is taking away from business, along with the idea that brick-and-mortar business owners are committed to their location, for better or worse. The topic has dominated local BID meetings, leaving some owners wondering if the trucks are making business more challenging, particularly in an era of inflation, with some customers opting for more budget-friendly choices.

“It varies based on the vendors,” said Leslie Ramos, the executive director of the 82nd Street Partnership. “Usually, they don’t like the large vendors, especially if it’s close to a restaurant selling similar food, because they feel it takes access away or blocks the view to their location, especially if people are driving by or going across the street. The other thing that I constantly hear from small businesses is that they feel that it isn’t fair competition, since they have to pay rent, insurance, utilities and their day to day operating cost is really high, including staffing cost and so they feel that the street vendors, take away from their ability to survive, because they take business away.” 

 According to a July 2025 study by the NYC Comptroller’s office, even years later, the economy is still not where it was before the pandemic or where it would have been had the pandemic not occurred. Pairing that factor with increased prices from tariffs on food and supplies for business owners, and a struggling job market in 2025, according to the U.S Bureau of Labor Statistics, it’s no wonder business owners along the street are feeling increased pressure and a sense of competition from food trucks that visit the neighborhood throughout the week.

Diego Valencia owns restaurants in Bayside and Jackson Heights. Photo credit: Mr. Pollo.

“Everybody has to make a living, and I understand that,” said Diego Valencia, who owns Mr. Pollo, a Colombian restaurant in Bayside and another restaurant in Jackson Heights. “This affects our store in Jackson Heights more, because we don’t have as many food carts [in Bayside] as we do over there, but it does still affect us here because we pay rent. As a customer, if I could get a burger for $5 instead of getting it in the restaurant for $10, I’m going to grab the $5 one, right? And I understand there’s a hustle for everything, but in a busy area, there has to be somewhere else where there’s not so much traffic of restaurants where [food trucks] can go, because they have to make a living as well.”

Photo credit: Mr. Pollo.

In Queens, the cost of rent for a small business can range anywhere from approximately $14,000-$23,000 a month, not including the cost of utilities, like electricity, gas, and water, which can range from about $2,000-$5,000 a month. The cost of air conditioning during hotter months can add on at least $3,000 as well, along with the cost of food and drink, and labor, which varies depending on how many employees an establishment has.

“In the summer, the air conditioning is on all day, so your bill is coming for at least $4-5,000, and the question is, are you making those extra $5,000 to pay?” asked Valencia. “Going food shopping for the restaurants, you’re spending at least two grand. People with liquor licenses, every order is at least $3,000, and that’s what a lot of people might not understand. I can’t give you something for $12 that you might be able to get on the corner. They’re trying to save money, and I understand that, but because they have that choice, that’s where it becomes a problem.”

Photo credit: King of Falafel and Shawarma.

Still, the notion that food truck owners get off scot-free each month and don’t bear a financial burden simply isn’t true, according to Nidal Zeideia, who runs King of Falafel and Shawarma, a family business that his father, Freddy Zeideia, first started as a food cart in 2002 in Astoria before expanding to a storefront and three trucks throughout the city. The well-known brand sells authentic Halal Palestinian cuisine, which his father sought to bring to New Yorkers when he first started his business. The brand presently has a food truck that sits on Bell Boulevard in Bayside, along with one in East Elmhurst, and another on Park Avenue in Manhattan. While food trucks don’t pay rent, the businesses are not immune to financial struggles and challenges. Zeideia has said he also deals with nearby storefronts on Bell Boulevard that call the Department of Sanitation and the NYC Department of Health in hopes of getting him fined.

Nadal Zeideia works with his father’s business who own three food trucks and a storefront in Astoria. Photo credit: King of Falafel and Shawarma.

“People don’t understand, they think it’s easy, when it’s busy everybody’s busy, when it’s slow everybody’s slow,” said Zeideia. “We have a shop [in Astoria] that has three food trucks open next to us, and we don’t bother anybody. Some weeks we don’t make money, I don’t make my salary, but I pay my guys, and I’m here with them all day.”

While food trucks aren’t the same as a storefront, they still pay for the cost of food and supplies, wages for their employees, garage fees for their trucks, along with long hours in a small space, and slower business in colder months and bad weather. Costs vary monthly and even seasonally, including a monthly lease or loan payment for the truck, which varies from $2,000-$3,000 a month, fuel and propane, which can range anywhere from $500 to $1,500 per month, and maintenance and repairs on the truck that can cost anywhere from $500 to $750 a month. Food and drink runs from $1000 to $5000 per month, as well as commissary fees in NYC that cost $500-1500 a month, garages for trucks, which run from $3000 and up depending on how many trucks a business owns, and labor to pay employees.

“The food truck industry in New York has become part of the community,” said Zeideia. “Let’s say on a pita, if I sell it for $10 and I make $1 or $1.50 on it, when they sell it for $15 or $16 and they say, well, they have to pay tax-we all pay it. They have five or six employees, we have four employees.”

‘There should be an even playing field’

While food truck and storefront owners certainly have a mix of similar and different financial and logistical challenges throughout their day, property owners can also feel the squeeze with only so much space in such a busy city, and when trucks or food carts park nearby or on the sidewalk, it can certainly be unclear what is permitted or not. According to NYC.gov, when it comes to pushcarts, they must be on a sidewalk that’s at least 12 feet wide, and the unit must be set up within 6-12 inches of the curb, and at least 10 feet from any crosswalk, driveway, or subway entrance/exit. The mobile food unit also has to be at least 20 feet from a building’s entrance or exit. In terms of food trucks and vehicles, owners must obey the same placement regulations as mobile food vending carts, and the truck needs to have a current Department of Motor Vehicles registration, an inspection sticker, and insurance. Additionally, the trucks are not allowed to vend at parking meters, and the engines are not allowed to idle.

Roosevelt Ave. has various food trucks and carts along the street which Ramos said could have a lot more input from the city to make things fair for store fronts and vendors. Photo credit: Jessica Militello

“A lot of businesses rely on customers that come from outside of the neighborhood, and I’m not just talking about 82nd Street, but in general,” said Ramos. “On 82nd Street, our biggest issue is that street vendors are parked all day, so it makes it very difficult for customers to find a spot, and that also creates a huge traffic jam flowing down. There are also issues with cleanliness, and who’s responsible for maintaining the sidewalks and keeping them clean. In general, our small businesses support vendors, but they support limited balanced numbers, not these unrestricted numbers.”

In nearby Flushing, a piece of legislation, Int 0969, was passed in 2018 by City Council Member Peter Koo, prohibiting street vendors and obstructions on certain streets in Downtown Flushing for the purpose of allowing more access and space for pedestrians to pass after nine feet of widened sidewalk space on Main Street was expanded, which led to an increase in street vending of all kinds. According to Noah Sheroff, the executive director of the Bayside BID, he has been in talks with NYC Small Business Services and Council Member Vickie Paladino’s office to seeking legislation that would be similar, but with the intention to place storeowners in the neighborhood as a priority for their businesses over the food truck vendors, which may even include having them set up shop away from BID areas. Sheroff and BID members feel there are plenty of other spaces throughout northeast Queens and beyond where food trucks and other vendors can flourish without being so near to restaurants and other businesses along Bell Blvd.

Noah Sheroff, (l) with State Senator John Liu and a member of NYPD at last year’s national night out. Photo credit: Bayside BID

According to Sheroff, the topic is definitely nuanced, particularly in a struggling economy where everyone is just trying to survive. Sheroff has been the executive director of the Bayside BID since January 2024, often working with his team and small businesses in the area to help promote them through events, community outreach, meetings, and workshops. He also personally maintains a rapport with business owners in the BID along with elected officials and community leaders in the area.

When he first joined the BID, the topic of food trucks was brought to his attention almost immediately, including during an annual meeting for the prior fiscal year 2023. Sheroff said the topic dominated a good portion of the meeting, particularly food trucks that come and go throughout the week and sell similar items at a discounted price to what storefronts in the area are selling.  

“I understand that everyone is trying to make a living,” said Sheroff. “This can be a struggle; New York City is expensive, and it’s tough to make it here. I have no hatred towards the food trucks, but I think there should be an even playing field in terms of what’s allowed, given the cost, particularly those overhead costs that brick and mortar businesses face.”

tariff

Businesses along Bell Blvd. in Bayside.Via Google Maps

‘How does the city allow that?’

According to John Bonavita, who has been a commercial property owner in Bayside for well over 12 years, a Jamaican food cart visits the neighborhood every Saturday and Sunday and parks their food cart right on the sidewalk and create billowing smoke, which impacts a tenant with lung issues. According to Bonavita, the issue is not that simple to resolve anymore. In the past, he said it would usually be a matter of calling the 111th Precinct, who would quickly come over and deal with the issue. However, since April 2023, food truck complaints are now handled by the NYC Dept. of Sanitation, who, according to Bonavita, eventually come to the site; however, it’s generally by midweek, making the issue difficult to resolve, since the weekend food cart is long gone by then. Bonavita has been frustrated with the issue for some time now because it would appear there’s no one to enforce the laws or resolve the long-standing issue.

“They pull these trailers that have ovens and fans, and then they put up ropes like it’s a red carpet on the sidewalk,” said Bonavita. “It’s ridiculous, and it’s like, how does the city allow that? If something breaks, I have to replace it, I have to file for a permit, and then I have to get it signed off. When it snows, I have to clean the snow and melt the ice, and then these guys just come like they’re owners and drive their truck right onto the sidewalk, do their business, and then leave, and they’re infringing on my tenant who pays a nice rent.”

Although the Department of Sanitation may not be equipped to respond immediately, Sheroff mentioned that calls to 311 definitely make a difference over time.

“This is a data-driven city, so if there are a lot of complaints about a particular issue, that usually prompts a more forceful response from the agency, so to speak, so I think there are some opportunities with 311,” said Sheroff.

According to Ramos the city could solve a lot of the tension and issues between food truck vendors and storefronts if they have more of a hand in where trucks set up, how adjacent it is to similar store fronts, and let food trucks spread out more evenly throughout the borough instead of being clustered in one main area, such as 82nd Street in Jackson Heights in order for everyone to make a living without overstepping on each other’s personal space.

“The city needs to establish zoning requirements and identify the locations, and I think the city can absorb all the vending that we have [on 82nd St.]  and spread it evenly across the city,” said Ramos. “That would be extremely helpful for the vendor and for the small businesses, because then they can determine where they decide to rent and what type of goods they can sell. When it comes to the size of the vendor, [the city can] make sure that they are following the rules. Vendors are taking up very large spaces, setting up multiple tables, setting up tents, and that is the primary reason where conflict starts between the businesses and the vendors.”

Presently, it’s hard to say for certain how many food trucks there are in NYC, as licenses are difficult to maintain and there is presently a wait list with over 10,000 applicants on it with an estimated 10-year wait, which has cultivated a black market for food truck licenses over the years. According to the NYC Food Policy Center, the number of year-round mobile food vending permits is limited by law. The number was capped at about 5,100 permits for both food carts and trucks. In 2022, a new law was passed in order to address the black market by issuing 445 new “supervisory” licenses each year for 10 years. However, the rollout has been slow, and the wait list has been yet another challenge in operating a food truck in NYC.

“I think that the city needs to be more creative in how it accommodates vendors in the community,” said Ramos. “There’s plenty of examples in the neighborhood where businesses are co-locating out of storefronts where previous vendors were selling.”

Ramos also believes that a program can be created for entrepreneurs in order to give them a path to transition from a food truck to a storefront over time, in order to reduce so much congestion and leave food trucks for those who have more of a financial need or don’t have other options.

“The city should be creating a path for vendors to move from the street to brick and mortar and limit the number of establishments that any particular street vendor can have throughout the city,” said Ramos. “I think vending should be for people who are starting up or who have no other options, and they should make sure that there’s not large street vending enterprises, because those are taking away from small businesses as well as the street vendors who really need and rely on starting up their business on the streets of New York.”

Though the main sentiment among business owners is that anyone is more than welcome to try to make a living in the community, ideally, an ultimate plan is for any food trucks to find elsewhere in the neighborhood to pick a spot to flourish. 

“It’s something that we’re definitely working on,” said Sheroff. “We had a meeting with the Department of Small Business Services, which also oversees the BIDs, about possible solutions to deal with this, and there’s potential for legislation.”

The post Can Queens’ food scene thrive with both trucks and restaurants? appeared first on Jackson Heights Post.

kaberett: Trans symbol with Swiss Army knife tools at other positions around the central circle. (Default)
kaberett ([personal profile] kaberett) wrote2025-08-19 10:52 pm

victory of the day is GLASSES

Ordered, at least, to pick up next week.

Indulgence is a writing slope off eBay with a lucky dip of writing utensils, one of which I am very cheerful about...

Mary Anne Mohanraj ([syndicated profile] mamohanraj_feed) wrote2025-08-12 12:09 pm

A good marriage

Posted by Mary Anne Mohanraj

Thinking about marriage these days, with Obergefell possibly being challenged, and Loving perhaps to follow. Kev and I were partners for a long time before we got legally married, and to be honest, I didn’t experience much difference between ourselves. The world treats us differently, though, both socially and legally. And I admit, it’s useful, […]
Mary Anne Mohanraj ([syndicated profile] mamohanraj_feed) wrote2025-08-11 05:14 pm

Fairy roses and a groundcover

Posted by Mary Anne Mohanraj

Fairy roses and a groundcover whose name I’m forgetting. Anyone know? Editing to note, per comments, it’s scaveola, aka fan flower.